Social Security & Fake Boobs
I have two thoughts swirling around in my head.
First, I know this woman, she's about 5'9", very in shape, svelte and beautiful. She's always had a small chest (read A cup). I used to see her everyday outside but for the last couple months I haven't seen her at all. Come to find out she breast augmentation surgery and, as a result, has been holed up "healing" according to her husband. However, the scoop is that she's denying the implants and has told a few people that she did not have surgery. When The Husband has seen her and others, she holds her arms across her chest or otherwise attempts to hide her breasts. Her husband has said that she had the surgery and she has, apparently, told one or two people about it. I believe she is an adult and I'm happy for her for her surgery if it makes her feel better about herself but I'm trying to figure out why someone would try to hide it? I mean.... especially to the people that you see everyday. Could it be that she's embarassed? But surely she would have known before going into the surgery that people would notice. You can't go from an A cup to a full C or D cup without people noticing... not in today's society.
Second thought process. I have a neighbor, bless her heart, who's first husband passed from cancer right after they bought their house (we've lived here in this new development for 6 years) and they had a 6 month old child. Obviously, the child never knew his father and she single parented for a few years before she remarried. Quite some time ago she was telling me how her son receives a monthly check from social security. It's a large sum and, if I remember, it is close to $2,000 a month. He will continue to receive this sum until he is 18 or is adopted by another man. Her current husband treats this child like his own, the child calls him Dad, they have another baby together as well.... but the husband has never adopted the child because of this social security money. I'm conflicted. On the one hand, this child will never know his biological father and that father did pay into the social security system throughout his adult life (the amount per month the child is given is based, apparently, on the father's contributions during his lifetime). On the other hand, these people just bought a house worth at the very least 1.5 million dollars and, I would expect, more than that given the area it is in. They are also planning to retire in less than 8 years (they are in their early 40s) and have quite a stock portfolio... so my thought dilemma... should these people be avoiding the adoption of the child in order to retain the monthly social security payments when they have so much more than so many others in our society and when our society is hurting for money to help out those with less?


Comments
Hmm, that's odd about your neighbor. My sister had breast implants and while I am very opposed to it on many levels, it dramatically improved her self-esteem. She wanted everyone to know that she had it done. I got so tired of hearing about her boobs. LOL. It almost seems like it has the opposite effect on your neighbor. I feel sad for her. I hope that she can regain or find her self-esteem related to her body perception. It's so hard for women to have this and it's a shame that she's having these issues after getting surgery that was supposed to bolster it. Best wishes to her.
Posted by: Kerry / Reese | June 24, 2002 4:43 AM
Hmmm...My mom received a monthly allowance for my brother and I until we were 18years old because of our father's death when we were little. My mom remarried and had 2more children. For us, it wouldn't have mattered if he had adopted us...the money would have continued. (then again, it was paid by the Armed Forces and wasn't even *close* to 2000 USD!)
After we turned 18 and were still in school we received the money directly.
I am wondering why the receipt of money is contingent on the new father not adopting the children.
Posted by: Carolyn | June 25, 2002 2:59 PM
Had my father died while active duty, I would have received benefits regardless of any adoption. My mother, however, would not have received her continuation of benefits once she remarried in that situation.
As for social security, I'm not sure why it is contingent on the adoption of the child but that is what she told us....I couldn't find the information on the SS website. I'm not saying he isn't entitled to the money because, my gosh, that child lost his father... I just wonder would I take that money if I didn't *really* need it knowing how many people in this country do.
Posted by: Julie | June 26, 2002 2:29 PM
Well, if it were me (us), we'd probably never be in a position that we wouldn't need the money, but if we were, I wonder if I'd have the same outlook on life - if I would have the same values that I have now - because my life would have had to be drastically different to have that amount of money to spend on a house - so while I can sit here and very quickly say, "no, absolutely not - no WAY would I keep that money when we don't need it", I'm not sure I'd have that outlook if my life was such that I could afford a 1.5 million dollar home (which, I must admit is grand, but not as grand as 1.5 million dollars in Kansas).
Posted by: kathy | June 26, 2002 10:47 PM